This Just In: Budget Travel's Blog

You can always trust us—because we never take freebies or accept any travel discounts.
Recent Posts
  • All Recent Posts
People Are Talking…
Affordable Europe
Conciergerie and River Seine
A special series of posts delivering money-saving travel tips.
Popular Authors
Sean O'Neill
Blog Editor
View author page
Erik Torkells
Editor in Chief
View author page
Kate Appleton
Editor Online
View author page
AddThis Feed Button
Fares to NYC likely to rise
Posted by: Sean O'Neill, Tuesday, Dec 11, 2007, 9:04 AM

The Transportation Department plans to limit flights at J.F.K. airport, according to sources who spoke anonymously to the The New York Times in a story published this morning.

Last January, Congress lifted limits on the number of takeoffs and landings allowed at Kennedy airport. Since then, airlines have scheduled too many flights there. Airlines are scheduling about 100 flights an hour at Kennedy, and during peak demand hours, even more than that. But last summer, the airport was only able to handle about 80 takeoffs an hour, given summer storms and related delays, according to the Wall Street Journal.

The math is obvious. There will be about 20 fewer flights on average out of Kennedy, if the Transportation Department and the Federal Aviation Administration impose limits as expected.

Fewer flights mean that airlines will be able to charge more per flight. Fares are likely to rise because the other area airports are unlikely to be able to pick up more flights on their own.

But nothing is decided yet. The airlines are likely to fight any flight limits in court or by enlisting allies in Congress to pressure the federal agencies.

Here's why: Let's say that 20 flights a day are cut. If those 20 fewer flights cut the service of smaller airlines, such as Spirit and AirTran, the airlines will likely say that the system is unfair (anti-competitive) and arbitrary, especially if it appears to only apply to a single major airport. JetBlue is likely to be hurt the most, given that it flies more planes out of Kennedy than Delta, American, American Eagle, and United Airlines combined.

If the 20 fewer flights cut the service of the major airlines, such as Delta and United, those airlines might go to court. The major airlines would argue that the government is wrongfully taking the existing assets that they have invested to improve terminals. While federal agencies have a lot of leeway to do what they want with commercial airspace, they also are sensitive to political pressure and the potential hassles of judicial hearings and congressional interference.

Kennedy serves more than 80 airlines and an average of 65,000 travelers a day. Along with Newark and La Guardia airports, New York has the world's most crowded airspace, and more than a third of the country's flight delays happen there—causing delays to ripple nationwide, as was clearly explained by a recent story in New York magazine.

EARLIER Rage in the skies.

Filed Under: airport news, jfk
Reader Comments

The legacy carriers have invested a lot in the airport. But it's not just them building up JFK: JetBlue is spending $742 million on the new Terminal 5 set to open in September.

Posted By Paul Brady on December 11, 2007, 11:00 AM

Paul, Good point about JetBlue's investment, and (in your blog post on this topic) about Aviation Daily breaking the story that the Times followed-up on.
Thanks,
Sean

Posted By Sean on December 11, 2007, 5:40 PM

Leave a Comment


(This is a moderated blog. Your comment will need to be approved by the site owner before it will appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


We encourage users to analyze, comment on, and even challenge the articles, blogs, reviews, and multimedia features of BudgetTravel.com.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

Get E-Newsletters
Subscribe to the magazine now!