
Starting next summer, Philadelphia will require licenses for private tour guides operating within its historic district—which is, roughly put, the square mile around Independence Hall and the Liberty Bell.
The law requires guides—whether on foot, buses, trolleys, or horse-drawn carriages—to pass a written test and be re-certified every three years. (The National Park Service rangers who work inside Independence Hall and the Liberty Bell aren't affected by the rule, though. NPS has its own training requirements and quality-control checks.)
I recently met with Philadelphia tourism officials, who were buzzing about the legislation, which mayor Michael Nutter is expected to sign this Thursday. Once the program is running in little more than a year from now, the city's tourism website gophila.com plans to list the companies with certified guides.
Philly's exam, which will cost $25, hasn't been developed yet. It will be written by a group of tour operators, historians, and university professors.
After two years, the City Council plans to review the program and will likely expand it beyond the historic district. Many of the city's attractions, such as the zoo and museums on Ben Franklin Parkway, fall outside of the regulated zone.
Now if only Philly’s newly minted experts settle the debate of who makes the best cheesesteak! (For details on this debate, turn to the blogs at PhillyBurbs.)
Philadelphia isn't the first city to require that its tour guides be licensed. Charleston, New Orleans, New York City, Savannah, and Washington, D.C.,—and cities overseas, such as Rome—already license their tour guides.
Do you think this law will help prevent tour guides from embellishing history? Should every city enact similar legislation?
User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.
I think it is a very good idea. As an avid history lover, I want the story told right the first time. Therefore it will encourage me to visit different places and enjoy the accurate information being provided. It is a practice worth considering.
Posted By joe meade on May 13, 2008, 10:36 AM
As a Philadelphia tour guide, I can tell you that it is a nice idea that will ultimately do no good-except put money into that pockets of City Hall.
The best option is for certain tour operators to step up and police their own companies. History shows that when you try to accomplish something through legislation, it gets muddled. Politics take over, and the original purpose is lost.
Posted By Michael Tait on May 13, 2008, 4:32 PM
This legislation will not change anything. You can "test" all you want, but passing a test with a 70% means you are licensing guides to be WRONG 30% of the time. That's not good enough for me.
It would be smarter to invest public dollars in EDUCATION and TRAINING vs. licensing. Education would make better guides. With no enforcement, or better yet, thanks to the US Constitution's granted right to freedom of speech, tour guides can and will continue to entertain visitors with stories -- most of which are fully factual -- as they desire.
Posted By Mark Beyerle on June 24, 2008, 11:43 PM